17.2 In the case of regulated study programmes, must the professional suitability of the study programme be proven as part of the accreditation process?
17.5 Does a higher education institution have to make it transparent that a study programme does not qualify students for a regulated profession? Does the external presentation have to be checked during accreditation?
17.6 In the case of regulated study programmes, is there a mandatory need for an organizational link between the accreditation procedure and the procedure for determining the professional licensing of a study programme in accordance with § 35 MRVO? Do other peer review reports have to be consulted in order to assess the fulfillment of professional requirements?
